Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Real estate agents are fleeing the field. Is that good for homebuyers?

Parkvue Hills development is shown in 2021 in Spokane Valley.  (Jesse Tinsley/The Spokesman-Review )
By Aaron Gregg Washington Post

When real estate broker April Strickland looks at her local housing market in Gainesville, Florida, she sees a mismatch. Industry data shows that only a few hundred homes are sold each month, she said, yet there are more than 1,500 local Realtors.

Strickland has seen the ups and downs of the housing market since 1995, when she started managing her parents’ rental properties as a teenager.

But she said the business environment of the past two years is the most challenging she can remember – slower even than the years following the 2008 financial crisis.

“Quite frankly, Realtors are running out of money,” Strickland said.

An industry that swelled with newcomers in 2020 and 2021 has recently experienced a harsh slowdown – leaving the field no choice but to downsize, experts say. One widely cited analysis predicts that as many as 80% of the country’s real estate agents could find a new line of work.

“Many industry leaders think there are way too many agents and would like to reduce the number so the professionals can service more clients, thus allowing a reduction in commission levels in order to maintain current incomes,” said Steve Brobeck, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America.

By some measures, the exodus has begun.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics recorded 440,000 full-time real estate agents and brokers in 2023, about 72,000 fewer than the year before.

In Spokane, about 8% of real estate agents left the industry this past year, said Tom Hormel, recent past president of Spokane Realtors.

“It’s just such a tight market. There is no inventory for people to sell,” Hormel said. “If you are not selling homes, and it’s costing you money, you are going to find different jobs.”

Except for Redfin, which pays salaries, most real estate agents rely on commissions for income.

“If I don’t sell something, I don’t get paid,” said Hormel, a longtime real estate agent with RE/MAX of Spokane.

As of mid-April, the National Association of Realtors had about 1.5 million agents registered. That’s down more than 100,000 from 2022, according to Nick Gerli of the real estate data firm Reventure Consulting.

The Realtor group, which recently stopped publishing its membership figures, declined to comment for this story.

But earlier this year, Gerli, citing monthly reports that were published by the trade association, said NAR anticipates declines in Realtor membership for the next 24 months.

Hormel, who sits on the NAR board, said he doesn’t expect the decline to hurt either home buyers or sellers. He said turnover is part of the industry.

“Real estate has always seen an 80% turnover every five years. But in 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, more held on because it was a crazy market,” he said.

Hormel further explained that about 80% of the home sales are completed by about 20% of agents.

With interest rates remaining relatively high, deals have become so scarce that many real estate agents sell only a few homes a year. Hormel said several haven’t sold a home in several months.

A survey of about 2,000 real estate agents conducted by the Consumer Federation of America found that 49% of them sold fewer than two homes in 2023.

And real estate agents will soon face new rules that could result in sweeping changes to how they do business and how they get paid.

Under the new rules starting in August, real estate databases no longer will include offers of compensation for buyers’ agents.

That means those agents can no longer count on a cut of the seller’s windfall.

Investment bank Keefe Bruyette & Woods has estimated that as much as 30% of the total U.S. commissions revenue might be lost as a result.

The rules are the result of a court settlement between the NAR and groups of home sellers who said the commissions structure violated antitrust laws.

A federal court temporarily approved the settlement and will consider making the approval permanent in November.

And the pressure on the industry could continue – an April court decision cleared the Justice Department to reopen an earlier antitrust probe into the NAR and its rules for commissions.

Economists who study the real estate sector have long believed that a “decoupling” of buyer and seller commissions will persuade a significant number of real estate agents to abandon the field, though estimates vary as to how many.

The forecast by Keefe Bruyette & Woods projected that changes to the commission structure could cause 60 to 80% of U.S. real estate agents to leave the profession.

CUNY Baruch College’s Sonia Gilbukh and Yale School of Management’s Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham estimated that about 56% of agents would exit the market if one side’s commission remained at 3% while the other became competitive, Gilbukh said in an email describing the study.

A 2015 paper in the Rand Journal of Economics by Panle Jia Barwick and Parag Pathak predicted that a 50% reduction in commissions would result in 40% fewer agents.

Experts see a silver lining in a potential exodus of real estate agents: Those who remain might be more experienced and competent.

“This will be good for consumers because agents on average will be better at their job and will charge more competitive commissions,” Gilbukh said.

A “Realtor glut” has persisted since the industry’s pandemic high point, said Brobeck, who also sees a departure of real estate agents as probably a good thing for home buyers.

Another Bureau of Labor Statistics measure that includes part-timers shows 1.8 million people working in the real estate sector as of April, up slightly from last year.

But with so many of them doing relatively little business and holding other full-time jobs, selling homes at this point is “clearly a part-time industry,” Brobeck wrote in a recent report.

Under the rules coming in August, agents will feel more pressure to justify their compensation, Brobeck said, because buyers will be more likely to press for a lower commission. That should also create space for discount brokers serving first-time buyers, he said.

“As this occurs, residential real estate markets will become more diverse and competitive,” Brobeck said.

Gilbukh, the CUNY researcher, believes that only the most experienced agents will be able to keep charging high commissions.

Agents that survive the upcoming transition are likely to be better connected within their industry, having deeper relationships with professionals such as contractors, electricians, plumbers and appraisers, and “overall better poised to advise their clients,” Gilbukh said.

Contracts under the proposed new rules should bring more clarity to the relationship between buyers and their agents, several analysts said.

That could cut down on “ghosting” incidents, in which prospective home buyers will talk to an agent while searching for a home, only to finalize the deal with a different agent, or put their housing search on hold.

“Previously there was no real sense of accountability, where Realtors didn’t really have to explain what they do,” Strickland said.

The proposed NAR deal was met with fear throughout the industry when it was announced in March, Strickland said.

But the panic has given way to a “wait-and-see” attitude, she said.

She characterized the NAR deal as a positive thing overall:

“It will eliminate people who quite frankly aren’t up to snuff, who can’t do the work, who don’t want to educate themselves and learn new ways or working,” she said.

“This will be a good pivot for our industry.”

Spokesman-Review reporter Thomas Clouse contributed to this report.