Moscow rushes to send troops as Ukrainian attack on Kursk tests Kremlin

Russian President Vladimir Putin convened a meeting of his Security Council on Friday and his military commanders rushed to send reinforcements as a stunning Ukrainian incursion into Russia’s western Kursk region presented the biggest challenge to the Russian leader since an uprising by Wagner mercenaries in June 2023.

With Russia’s military eager to quash the surprise attack that is now in its fourth day, questions mounted over failures in intelligence and strategy that allowed Ukrainian troops to cross the border and seize what some Russian analysts estimated to be about 100 square miles of territory in Kursk.

The attack on Kursk, which is adjacent to Ukraine’s Sumy region, caught Russian defenses thinly staffed and seemingly unaware.

“This is a very big blow to the reputation of the Russian authorities, of the military and Putin,” one Russian business executive said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid retribution or prosecution. “Because for two and a half years there has been minimal damage to Russian territory, apart from the occupied territories (in Ukraine). It was only drones.”

“Now it’s not clear how many victims there have been, there has been some destruction and its clear they are not able to stop it quickly,” the business executive added.

Russian military bloggers reported fighting underway across the embattled region, and some Russian analysts said they feared it could take a long time to take back the territory seized by Ukrainian troops if a full-scale counterattack by Russian reinforcements was delayed for several more days. Ukrainian brigades would have time to dig in to fortified positions, potentially handing Kyiv a powerful bargaining chip in case of future cease-fire or peace negotiations.

A leading member of the Russian parliament, Andrey Gurulyov, who is a former deputy commander for Russia’s southern military district, condemned the botched response to the incursion. Posting on the Telegram messaging platform, Gurulyov called for the military prosecutor to investigate decisions by commanders to transfer defense forces from the Kursk region ahead of the attack.

Questions were also being raised about the failure to act on what Gurulyov said were intelligence reports of Ukrainian armed forces preparing to attack the region 48 hours before the assault began.

Sergei Markov, a Kremlin-connected political analyst, said there were obvious failures.

“This is a blow because it is clear that the signal came from intelligence to the leadership but … measures were not taken,” Markov said. “This is a failure of the entire system of intelligence, and since Putin is responsible for this then its clear this is a blow to Putin.”

However, Markov said the situation could be resolved if Ukraine’s attack is defeated. “People are still hoping this will end in the destruction of the Ukrainian forces,” he said.

Unverified video of the fighting in Kursk and its aftermath showed Ukrainian forces had used donated Western assault vehicles and weapons in the attack, which officials in Washington, Berlin and elsewhere said was appropriate because Kyiv was defending itself.

A Russian academic close to senior Moscow diplomats warned that the use of U.S. weaponry on Russian soil crossed “another red line” that was likely to have serious consequences even as the ultimate gain for Kyiv was unclear.

“This is a step towards further escalation and of course there are additional risks since we don’t know how Russia is going to react,” the academic said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “But it seems to me it isn’t something which principally changes the military situation since this is a relatively small operation. It is a PR operation rather than an attempt to really change the situation on the battlefield.”

The academic added that audacious seizure of territory by Ukrainian troops was unlikely to encourage Putin to make compromises.

On Friday, police in Sumy said that 270 of the region’s residents had died since the start of Russia’s invasion in February 2022. As they braced for Russian reprisals, the Sumy authorities said they had ordered the evacuation of 20,000 residents and were coordinating transport for them.

Ukraine’s bold cross-border incursion followed weeks of intense summer of fighting in which Russia has made steady gains in Ukraine’s east, putting pressure on Kyiv’s depleted and fatigued forces.

Analysts say the attack may be intended to divert Russian troops from other locations along the front, as well as leverage in future negotiations. Some military experts questioned the wisdom of Ukraine’s attack given its weakness at other key points on the front, and they predicted that Russia’s far larger and better-equipped military likely would oust or kill the Ukrainians sooner than later.

Still, the successful operation on Russian soil - after more than two years of fighting almost exclusively in Ukraine - had psychological value for Kyiv, boosting the morale of Ukrainian troops and civilians by showing Putin and his military as hobbling and ineffective.

Mykhailo Podolyak, a Ukrainian presidential adviser, suggested on Thursday that any military actions on the Russian territory could improve Ukraine’s position in future negotiations with Russia to end the war. Podolyak did not comment on the Kursk incursion specifically.

Ukrainian officials have remained remarkably tight-lipped about the operation and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made only oblique references to it during his nightly speeches, saying Russia “should feel” the ramifications of the war it has inflicted on Ukraine.

Markov said it was likely that the Ukrainian government plans to use the seized territory as a bargaining chip in future talks and that it was now a race against time for Russian troops to counterattack before the Ukrainian brigades dig in.

The conduct of the war so far has shown that “the advantage goes to those defending,” he said. “I think their plan is to take as much territory as possible and while Russia is collecting its reserves they will build fortifications.”

Even though Russia has greater aviation forces than Ukraine, Moscow’s recent military operations in Kharkiv and Donbas have shown that it is extremely difficult to seize territory. “If they act at the same speed as Russia is attacking elsewhere it could take a year to take back the Kursk region,” Markov said.

Reports by Russian military bloggers and pro-war Telegram channels suggested that Ukrainian troops have occupied more than 20 Russian border villages and partially at least one small city, Sudzha. he head of the city administration in Kurchatov, where Russia’s Kursk nuclear power station is based, said on Friday that Ukrainian troops were nearing the nuclear plant.

Previously, anti-Kremlin militias backed by Ukraine have launched several cross-border attacks into Russian territory, but the Kursk operation marked the deepest and most effective incursion yet.

“Ukrainian forces have clearly advanced quite far into Kursk, but how much territory they control or actually intend to control remains unknown,” said Michael Kofman, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Footage released Friday by Russia’s defense ministry showed a military column transporting artillery and armored vehicles entering the Kursk region, some 330 miles west of Moscow. The defense ministry reported that BM-21 Grad multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) and artillery pieces had been sent to support forces fighting in the Sudzhansky district of the Kursk region.

Russia’s Emergency Situations Ministry declared a state of emergency in Kursk on Friday, as thousands were evacuated. Videos circulating on social media appeared to show columns of cars leaving, while Russian authorities released photos of emergency workers supporting residents. Russia’s Health Ministry said at least 66 people were injured.

Ukrainian forces initially stormed the Kursk region’s Sudzhansky district early Tuesday, before advancing deeper into Russian territory as Russian authorities claimed, falsely, that they had repelled the attack. On Friday, Russia’s Defense Ministry claimed to have killed 280 Ukrainian troops and destroyed 27 armored vehicles over the previous 24 hours.

“Units of the North group of forces, along with incoming reserve troops, army aviation strikes and artillery fire, foiled the enemy’s attempts to advance deeper into Russian territory in the Kursk area,” the ministry said.

Footage online appeared to show the aftermath of an attack on an ambushed Russian military column in the Rylsk region, about 20 miles from the Ukrainian border. Footage showed the bodies of dozens of Russian soldiers in destroyed vehicles. Russian military analysts speculated that the column was hit with U.S.-provided HIMARS rockets.

The Post could not independently verify the claims. A man who reportedly filmed the video of the convoy was detained and questioned by Russian authorities, according to Rybar, a Russian military blogger with links to the defense ministry.

Ukraine on Friday said that it also had hit Russia’s Lipetsk military airfield, 220 miles from the border. Lipetsk’s regional authorities declared a state of emergency, evacuated residents from nearby villages and confirmed that there were detonations at an “energy infrastructure facility.” Satellite imagery published by Planet Labs on Friday, appeared to show the total obliteration of the airfield.

Meanwhile, a Russian strike on a supermarket in Kostiantynivka in Ukraine’s eastern Donetsk region Friday killed at least 14 people and injured 37, according to Ukrainian officials.

Footage from the site showed billowing plumes of smoke and blood spattered on the ground, as well as substantial damage to surrounding shops, vehicles and buildings.

“Russia will answer for this terror,” Zelenskyy warned on Telegram, as a rescue operation continued.

- - -

Serhiy Morgunov and Isabelle Khurshudyan in Kyiv and Siobhán O’Grady in Dnipro, Ukraine, and John Hudson in Washington contributed to this report.

- - -

Graphic:

https://washingtonpost.com/documents/221e4cd3-edcb-415e-929e-2cf984b1b475.pdf