Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Pac-12 Conference’s future hinges on George Kliavkoff media rights proposal

By Jon Wilner Bay Area News Group

The future of a 108-year-old college athletics conference likely will be determined in the next few weeks as the Pac-12’s existential crisis hurtles toward a conclusion.

Commissioner George Kliavkoff on Tuesday presented details of a media-rights contract to the nine remaining university presidents, the latest step in a process that began last summer when the Los Angeles schools announced their departure to the Big Ten in 2024.

How will the saga end?

If the contract proposal is deemed to carry satisfactory revenue and desirable media partners, the schools are expected to link arms for the remainder of the decade, perhaps with replacements for the three outgoing members, USC, UCLA and Colorado.

The meeting Tuesday was described as “positive and productive” by a source. The presidents are expected to meet again soon – a specific date has not been made public – to potentially ratify the deal.

If Kliavkoff’s proposal doesn’t meet standards, the conference as we know it might cease to exist.

As many as three schools could join the Big 12, which is pursuing Arizona but is believed to be targeting Arizona State and Utah, as well.

That would leave six in limbo: Stanford, Cal, Oregon, Oregon State, Washington and Washington State.

At that point, with the so-called Four Corners schools gone, the six West Coast universities would have two options:

• They could attempt to reform a lesser version of the conference through expansion. San Diego State likely would be the top choice, along with SMU and perhaps Colorado State. But the options are few, largely because of the paucity of schools west of the Rockies. Of the 10 conferences that play major college football, only two are located in the Mountain and Pacific time zones.

• Oregon, Washington and perhaps the Bay Area duo could attempt to join the Big Ten and form a West Coast division that would include USC and UCLA. That scenario, however, likely would require the quartet to join the Big Ten with reduced revenue shares compared to the 16 existing members. And it would leave Washington State and Oregon State with no home.

Both scenarios would result in the schools facing massive resource deficits relative to their competition in other Power Five conferences, thereby impacting the competitive experience for their athletes.

Because football and men’s basketball generate the revenue used to support all other teams, anything that undermines success on the field and court (for example, smaller budgets for recruiting and coaching staff salaries) has ramifications for the Olympic sports.

While ticket sales and philanthropy provide vital dollars for any athletic department, the media-rights deal often serves as the foundation for annual revenue.

The Pac-12’s current deal, which began in 2012-13, expires next summer and pays an average of $20.8 million per school over the term. The benchmark for the new agreement is approximately $31 million, which would mirror the deal signed by the Big 12 last fall.

In addition to the valuation level, the current Pac-12 schools want media partners that provide visibility for the teams and athletes. While there could be a streaming component (Amazon or Apple), the presidents are believed to desire a presence on linear television (ESPN).

Neither the valuation nor the media partners in the next contract cycle was viewed as a challenge until the L.A. schools opted to leave the Pac-12 for membership in the Big Ten starting next summer.

With the loss of its top football (USC) and basketball (UCLA) brands and the massive L.A. media market, the conference entered an existential crisis unlike any it has experienced in more than half a century.

Colorado’s departure to the Big 12, announced last week, created anxiety across the conference footprint and expedited Kliavkoff’s timeline for presenting the presidents with a contract offer.

Will it compare favorably with the Big 12’s figure?

How deeply will it interlock the Pac-12 with the sports streaming giants, Apple and Amazon?

To what extent will ESPN and other linear networks be involved?

How many night games will be included?

Media deals are complicated arrangements for conferences, particularly when new partners are involved. The Pac-12’s negotiations have dragged on longer than expected.

Resolution should come in weeks, if not days, with the future of the conference in the balance.