Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Labor seen emerging as a top threat to rally in risky assets

Members of the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions are shown during a protest in Uiwang, South Korea, on Dec. 6.  (SeongJoon Cho/Bloomberg )
By Richard Henderson Bloomberg

Investors positioning for a rally in riskier assets next year may be underestimating the threat from millions of workers around the world protesting for higher wages.

While signs that inflation has peaked have fueled bets on everything from a weaker dollar to a rebound in global stocks in 2023, there is growing unease among some market strategists that a breakout in labor costs will crimp the flow of money out of havens and into assets that thrive in an economic upswing.

In Washington, the minimum wage is set to increase on Sunday to $15.74 an hour, which is up from $14.49 an hour that took effect on Jan. 1, according to the state Department of Labor and Industries.

The flip side of this scenario of worker unrest and entrenched high inflation is elevated Treasury yields, a resurgent greenback and demand for physical commodities and value stocks.

Warning signs abound, with labor unrest surging in key economies.

U.K. Border Force workers and railway staff launched fresh strikes Wednesday that Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s spokesman said were causing “massive disruption.”

In one dispute in Germany, some 900,000 workers participated in walkouts before the country’s largest labor union and employers agreed to an 8.5% wage increase.

South Korean truck drivers have disrupted the auto, petrochemical and steel industries. And striking Starbucks baristas in Seattle have also grabbed headlines.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and his European counterpart, Christine Lagarde, both underscored the impact of labor costs after hiking interest rates this month.

“This is the definitive battle of 2023 – it’s labor versus the paymasters,” said John Vail, chief global market strategist for Nikko Asset Management in Tokyo.

“If wage hikes go through, it’ll be stagflationary and a head wind for markets, both bonds and stocks.”

“Higher rates for longer would potentially mean another leg up in bond yields, which is bad news for investors in government bonds and high-risk corporate debt,” said Shane Oliver, head of investment strategy and economics for AMP Services Ltd. in Sydney.

“It perpetuates the defensive trade and the value trade. It would be a very negative environment for growth stocks,” he said.

Michael Mullaney, head of research for Boston Partners, sees shorter duration, more cyclical stocks doing well if 2023 is a year of persistent high inflation.

“Stocks with long, long tails of earnings distribution will continue to suffer in the higher-for-longer interest rate scenario,” Mullaney said. “Value stocks do well and commodity plays, whether materials or industrials.”

Cash would also find fresh appeal, according to Nikko’s Vail, mirroring a winning trade when the mix of inflation and low growth sapped markets nearly half a century ago.

“If you were investing in the late 1970s, the best thing would have been to put your money in a money market fund. Short-term interest rates go up in a stagflationary environment,” said Vail.

The case for putting money into physical commodities is a tougher call, in his view, given that inflation tends to push them up while the weak economy saps demand.