Arrow-right Camera

Color Scheme

Subscribe now

Tax reform deceptive

The United States went further into debt by two-thirds trillion dollars in 2017, meaning the government has not been collecting enough taxes before tax cuts. Yet, Congress just voted to further increase the national debt by reducing taxes for the wealthy.

It deceptively is called tax reform, where the cost of government has been shifted from the elite few to bottom 50 percent in income.

The average of 5 recent national polls at the end of November show that only 32 percent of the population supports the tax cut with 46 percent opposed. Still the tax cuts have passed despite the opposition.

The tax cuts passed because some billionaires threatened to pull their big campaign donations to the current dominate party. This demonstrates that campaign donations are influencing congressional decisions, which meets the definition of bribery.

We can blame the Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court for this corruption where donations by a wealthy few can dominate the will of the majority. It is also apparent that one party has sold their votes to the highest bidder.

George Clark

Deer Park



Letters policy

The Spokesman-Review invites original letters on local topics of public interest. Your letter must adhere to the following rules:

  • No more than 250 words
  • We reserve the right to reject letters that are not factually correct, racist or are written with malice.
  • We cannot accept more than one letter a month from the same writer.
  • With each letter, include your daytime phone number and street address.
  • The Spokesman-Review retains the nonexclusive right to archive and re-publish any material submitted for publication.

Unfortunately, we don’t have space to publish all letters received, nor are we able to acknowledge their receipt. (Learn more.)

Submit letters using any of the following:

Our online form
Submit your letter here
Mail
Letters to the Editor
The Spokesman-Review
999 W. Riverside Ave.
Spokane, WA 99201
Fax
(509) 459-3815

Read more about how we crafted our Letters to the Editor policy