Origin of Kennewick Man disputed

ELLENSBURG – Not only was the ancient human known as Kennewick Man not Native American, he was not even from the Columbia River valley where his bones were found, according to the scientist who led the court battle to study his remains.

The more than 9,300-year-old skeleton is at the center of a yearslong rift between scientists who want to examine it and tribes who claim it and are seeking to have it reburied.

On Tuesday, Columbia Plateau tribal representatives invited Doug Owsley, a physical anthropologist at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History, to meet with them and discuss his findings.

Owsley said isotopes in the bones indicate Kennewick Man was a hunter of marine mammals.

“They are not what you would expect for someone from the Columbia Valley,” he said at the gathering hosted by Central Washington University. “This is a man from the coast, not a man from here.”

While Owsley has noted before that Kennewick Man was not of Native American descent, this was the first time he’s said the man was not even from this area.

Owsley said the skull is most similar to an Asian coastal people whose characteristics are shared with people, later, of Polynesian descent.

“There is not any clear genetic relationship to Native American peoples. I do not look at him as Native American,” he said, adding there is still much to learn.

Kennewick Man was found in 1996. The 300 bones are held at the Burke Museum in Seattle.

A federal appeals court ruled in 2004 that the bones were not protected by the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act because they were so old that it was impossible to link them to modern-day tribes.

The tribal members who listened to Owsley stuck to their conviction that Kennewick Man is a part of their people’s past and needs to be reburied.