Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Both candidates hit trail promising to cut taxes

By Michael D. Shear and Peter Slevin Washington Post

LEE’S SUMMIT, Mo. – As the U.S. housing crisis deepens and job losses accelerate, Sen. John McCain is trying to distill the debate over the economy into a simple, and familiar, message over taxes.

“I’ll keep taxes low and cut ’em where I can,” the Republican presidential candidate vowed Monday afternoon at a rally in the swing state of Missouri. “My opponent will raise your taxes! My tax cuts will create jobs. His tax increases will eliminate ’em.”

McCain’s approach is a familiar one for Republicans, who have for years promised to lower taxes and accused Democrats of wanting to raise them. “All you have got to do is appeal to the common sense of the voters. They get it,” said Mark Salter, one of McCain’s top aides. “Go out there and state your case. It’s no more nuanced or complicated that that.”

Mindful of the difficulty Democrats have had in countering a tough message on taxes, Sen. Barack Obama has charged that his Republican opponent is purposely steering away from offering the kind of detailed economic policies that voters are craving during hard times.

In Flint, Mich., where unemployment is twice the national average, Obama on Monday promised a cut to 95 percent of taxpayers. He said retirees earning less than $50,000 would pay no taxes on Social Security payments, and he urged Congress to pass a second stimulus package “so that people would have a little more money in their pockets.”

Obama also talked about a $4,000 annual tuition tax credit for college, trade schools or retraining classes. He said that he would require employers to set up retirement investment accounts and that the federal government would make a one-time $500 starter contribution for each worker.

In a briefing for reporters on Monday, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe also described the economy as McCain’s “huge Achilles’ heel” and the central question in voters’ minds. “On the economy, more and more so every day, people want a clear departure,” from the policies of President Bush, Plouffe said.

But the advantage Obama has enjoyed for months on the economy appears to be fading as the Democratic candidate tries to make the more complicated argument to voters: Some taxes will go up, others will go down. Big corporations and the rich will pay more, but the middle class will pay less.

In a Washington Post-ABC News poll, Obama’s edge on the economy has slipped to only five percentage points, a low for the campaign.

“He’s a very smart guy and clever,” McCain aide Salter said of Obama. “The way he describes things, it’s always a little bit of this, a little bit of that. The fact is, he’s proposing tax increases.”

According to an analysis by the Tax Policy Center, a joint project of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, Obama and McCain are both proposing tax plans that would result in cuts for most families.

All taxpayers would receive a cut under McCain’s plan. Taxes for those who make less than $226,982 would go down under Obama’s proposal and they would rise for those who make more than $603,403.

Obama would give the biggest cuts to those who make the least, while McCain would give the largest cuts to the very wealthy.

McCain’s embrace of Republican purists on taxes is somewhat ironic, given his history of being viewed with suspicion by anti-tax activists who accused him of betraying their cause by voting against President Bush’s tax cut proposals early in the administration.

McCain’s refusal to pledge not to ever raise taxes and his efforts to reform the campaign finance system made an enemy out of anti-tax crusaders like Grover Norquist. But Norquist and others have now rallied to McCain’s side, prompted in part by his new, tough rhetoric on their key issue.