Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Obama tours Afghan war zone

McCain maintains rival too raw to lead

An Afghan boy walks with his donkey as a police officer frisks another on Saturday at a checkpoint in Kabul, Afghanistan.  (Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
By Candace Rondeaux and Dan Balz Washington Post

KABUL, Afghanistan – Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama got his first look at deteriorating conditions in war-torn Afghanistan on Saturday, meeting with U.S. military commanders and local officials and touring part of the country by helicopter on the first day of a highly anticipated visit to the Middle East and Europe that drew a fresh rebuke from Republican rival John McCain.

Obama, traveling as part of an official congressional delegation, landed in the Afghan capital Saturday morning under tight security amid a surge of Taliban activity in recent weeks. After a briefing at Bagram air base, he flew by helicopter to the northeastern city of Jalalabad in Nangarhar province, where he met with U.S. soldiers and local leaders. From there, according to a U.S.-based aide, Obama set out by helicopter for a look at parts of eastern Afghanistan before returning to Kabul for a dinner with senior Afghan officials.

The presumptive Democratic nominee shied away from public comments as his trip began despite the intense interest in the trip and its political ramifications. McCain used his new weekly radio address Saturday to attack Obama’s foreign policy credentials and judgment. But as McCain sparred with his rival, the Illinois senator received an unexpected boost from Iraqi President Nouri al-Maliki, who told the German magazine Der Spiegel that he looked favorably on Obama’s call for a 16-month timetable for withdrawing most U.S. forces from Iraq.

Al-Maliki’s interview was published a day after White House officials announced that President Bush and the Iraqi leader had reached agreement on the need to set a “time horizon” for withdrawing U.S. troops, a significant shift in position by a president who long had resisted applying any semblance of a timeline on U.S. military involvement.

Iraq is expected to be part of the itinerary of Obama’s trip, which also includes stops in Jordan, Israel, Germany, France and Britain. The long-planned journey is designed to enhance Obama’s foreign policy credentials and allay concerns of some voters that he lacks the experience to serve as commander in chief while the country is engaged in two wars and a global campaign against terrorism.

For the past week, the two presidential candidates have engaged in a sharp debate over U.S. policy toward Iraq and its impact on an increasingly urgent situation in Afghanistan. McCain, showing he will not cede the foreign policy issue while Obama is on his trip, accused his rival in his radio address of inexperience, arrogance and even deceptiveness.

Obama, who was traveling with Sens. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and Jack Reed, D-R.I., called back to his advisers in the United States on Saturday evening from Kabul and, according to spokesman Robert Gibbs, described morale among U.S. forces as high but the situation dire.

Security was so tight for the visit that most Afghan and U.S. officials in Kabul refused to discuss whom he was scheduled to meet, with some denying that Obama was even in the country hours after he had landed.

His visit to Jalalabad and the normally quiet Nangarhar province came 12 days after at least 47 people were killed in a U.S.-led airstrike in the area that has fueled intense discussions about foreign military operations in Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said the majority of those killed in the bombing were women and children traveling in the area as part of a wedding party.

The Taliban and al-Qaida-linked insurgents have regrouped in eastern Afghanistan, especially near the Pakistani border. Nangarhar’s governor, Gul Agha Sherzai, a former warlord, briefed Obama and other members of the delegation about the situation there, according to Sherzai’s chief of staff.

Obama’s visit comes as the United States considers retooling its military strategy in the region to confront the mounting threat from Islamist insurgents operating in Pakistan’s tribal areas near the Afghan border. Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in the past week that he believes troop reductions in Iraq could be in the works, a development that would presumably allow the Pentagon to shift more soldiers and military resources to Afghanistan. The United States has about 140,000 troops in Iraq and 36,000 in Afghanistan as part of a NATO force there. NATO and U.S. forces have suffered significant losses in Afghanistan in recent months, and in June the number of U.S. soldiers killed there nearly equaled U.S. troop deaths in Iraq.

Obama has said he wants to send two additional U.S. combat brigades, about 7,000 troops, to Afghanistan. He has advocated reducing the U.S. force in Iraq so that troops can be redeployed to Afghanistan to quell the rising threat there.

Before his departure, Obama had accused McCain of waffling on whether to send more troops to Afghanistan, criticizing the decorated Vietnam War veteran for voting to go to war in Iraq. He called the loss of focus on the fight against the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan a “grave mistake.”

On Saturday, McCain said he too supported sending more troops to Afghanistan, from both NATO and the United States. But he said he also favored strategic and organizational changes in the mission there, patterned more directly on what has worked in Iraq. He also pledged to appoint a White House-based official with principal responsibility to oversee Afghanistan policy.

The Arizona senator offered a stinging critique of Obama for laying out his withdrawal strategy in Iraq before even embarking on his upcoming fact-finding visit to the war zone. “Apparently, he’s confident enough that he won’t find any facts that might change his opinion or alter his strategy,” McCain said. “Remarkable.”

He also cited his experience in the military and in Congress to draw a contrast with Obama’s far more limited exposure to national security issues. “In a time of war, the commander in chief’s job doesn’t get a learning curve,” he said. “And if I have that privilege, I will bring to the job many years of military and political experience.”

In his Spiegel interview, al-Maliki said he preferred to see U.S. troops leave “as soon as possible” and then added: “U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right time frame for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.”

Al-Maliki, who will soon meet with Obama, quickly noted that he was not endorsing the presumptive Democratic nominee’s candidacy, saying that was a decision for voters in the United States. But he implicitly criticized McCain, who has opposed such timetables, by saying that any effort to prolong the U.S. mission “would cause problems.”