Lay wants separate juries for two trials

HOUSTON — Enron Corp. founder Kenneth Lay wants different juries for his two upcoming trials.

The legal team for the former head of the disgraced energy company told U.S. District Judge Sim Lake in a court filing Monday that they don’t want the same jury that decides the outcome of the January fraud and conspiracy trial of Lay, former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling and former top accountant Richard Causey to hear a separate case pending against Lay that involves personal banking charges.

Lake suggested using the same jury in the interest of efficiency last month when he set Jan. 17 as the trial date for the trio. That trial is to focus on the premiere criminal case to emerge from the Justice Department’s lengthy investigation of Enron’s December 2001 collapse.

Michael Ramsey, Lay’s attorney, considered Lake’s idea, but said in Monday’s filing the use of the same panel would damage Lay’s right to an impartial jury in the banking case.

Even if Lay is acquitted in the larger case, “there exists a substantial possibility that jurors will not be able to simply disregard all of that argument and evidence, and will use it — intentionally or unintentionally, consciously or subconsciously — to infer a propensity on the part of the defendant to commit the other offenses, similar in nature, upon which they are called to deliberate in the second trial,” the filing said.

Lay can be ready for trial on the bank charges two months after the larger case ends so his lawyers won’t have to prepare for both trials simultaneously, the filing said.

Lake made the suggestion in relation to Lay’s speedy trial request still pending from August.

Lay’s legal team also asked that Lay receive a trial separate from Skilling and Causey on all 11 charges pending against him as soon as possible.