Town hall meetings have limits
Town hall meetings are under the microscope this August as some
members of Congress find hostile constituents waiting when they’re back from
Liberals and conservatives argue whether the town halls represent the general public mood or ginned up outrage. In truth, they may be a little of both. Town halls are many things – participatory democracy, political theater and off-season campaigning.
What they are not, however, is a particularly good place to get information.
This summer’s hot topic is health care reform, brought on by congressional consideration of a bill that fills more than 1,000 pages and is so vague that people are understandably confused and concerned. But the best way to clear up that confusion isn’t always by asking about a complicated subject while a dozen or so other people wait anxiously in line behind you and 400 or more of your neighbors cheer or boo.
Then there’s the other problem: sometimes people say things that just aren’t true, and members of Congress either don’t bother to correct them, or say other incorrect things.
Take Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers’ town hall meeting in
“We need to do a better job when it comes to road projects,” McMorris Rodgers said. “It’s common sense that a local contractor would get those jobs. But as you know, government does not operate, often times, using common sense.”
That sympathetic response that prompted a fair amount of clapping, some cheers, and at least one “Amen.” But it wasn’t particularly informative – and was arguably misleading.
First, a
It would be foolish to expect a member of Congress to have road construction contract details on the tip of her tongue. But McMorris Rodgers’ common sense approach isn’t really common sense, either.
Road construction and other government contracts go to the lowest bidder to protect taxpayers. Awarding them to a local company, simply because it is local, is something government got away from – in part to avoid the days when some county commissioner’s uncle’s neighbor’s cousin got the contract without concern for what it cost.
Explaining that fairly common principle of government probably would not have received applause, let alone an Amen. But it would have shed some light on the situation.
At another point in the discussion, McMorris Rodgers worried with
her constituents about the federal government setting up a public option health
plan. When
“Every plan has to offer maternity, every plan now offers the chiropractic, mental health, even hair transplants if I remember correctly,” she said. That last got a few laughs from the crowd.
It is funny, but it’s not true. Or to be charitable, she’s not remembering correctly.
Basic Health does not cover hair transplants, said Dave Wasser of
the state Health Care Authority. The closest it comes is covering a
prescription drug for some cancer patients to help regrow hair after chemotherapy.
Most other health insurance plans in
And it’s not true that the state only has three companies offering health insurance. It has 20 insurance companies, and five Health Maintenance Organizations, the Insurance Commissioner’s office reports – about twice the number available 10 years ago. It’s true that only three of them are among the nation’s biggest health insurers, but competition has actually grown, not shrunk, in the last decade.
Tracking down all the information for this column took several days, and more than a dozen phone calls – not something a politician can do standing in front of a town hall meeting. But if one is interested in generating light rather than heat, it's probably time well spent.