Insecticide-tainted bird seed is case for better monitoring

BIRDWATCHING — Responsible bird enthusiasts regularly clean their feeders to help prevent the spread of disease that can kill masses of birds. But even the most conscientious feeders can be deadly if the seed they buy is poisonous.

Scotts Miracle-Gro Co. recently admitted guilt in charges of distributing insecticide-tainted bird seed, potentially subjecting itself to $4.5 in fines to be approved by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

See news story here .

The American Bird Conservancy is spotlighting this case as an example of the need for regular monitoring to assure the safety of the nation’s bird seed supply.

The stakes are high. U.S. Fish and Wildlife surveys indicate that one in five Americans considers themselves among the birdwatchers who spend a total of $36 billion dollars a year on bird food, equipment and birding related travel.

The bottom line: With tons of bird seed put out each year to make birding convenient, huge numbers of wild birds are at risk if bird seed isn’t safe.

The ABC did its own tests and found that most bird seed from popular outlet is pesticide free.

But read on for the conservancy’s release of details on the shortfalls of EPA rules and the chilling disregard for bird safety by Scott officials.

The American Bird Conservancy (ABC), the nation’s leading bird conservation organization, contends it is the only organization to have carried out independent, nationwide bird seed tests.

In April 2011, ABC announced the results of its independent bird seeding testing efforts that were undertaken as a result of sporadic wild bird seed contamination incidents. The study analyzed samples taken from four different supply sources across the country: Walmart, Home Depot, Lowes, and Target. Bird seed was randomly purchased from the stores and then shipped to the California Food Safety Laboratory at the University of California, Davis, where the detailed analyses were conducted. The studies specifically looked for harmful pesticides, such as organophosphate and carbamate insecticides.

“We found that all of the tested bird seed was either free from pesticides or that pesticides occurred at only trace levels that would not threaten bird health. For the safety of the billions of birds that are fed by millions of Americans at backyard feeders, and in the light of this recent case against Scotts, this is clearly an issue that requires greater public attention. ABC seeks additional funding for continuing, needed testing,” said George Fenwick, President of ABC.

Here is the ABC’s summary of the Scott case:

According to court records, in 2008, Scotts distributed 73 million packages of birdseed coated with the insecticides Storcide II and Actellic 5E (containing the active ingredient chlorpyrifos and pirimiphos-methyl respectively), intended to keep insects from destroying the seed. They did this despite being alerted to toxicity dangers by a staff chemist and ornithologist. Storcide II is even labeled as “Toxic to birds. Toxic to wildlife,” and that “Exposed treated seed may be hazardous to birds.”

No such warning exists on the Actellic 5E label, however. The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) own fact sheet on pirimiphos-mehtyl states that “Ecological risks are not of concern to the Agency.” Yet the same fact sheet also states “Although pirimphos-methyl is highly toxic to birds and fish, these risks are not of concern based on the use pattern of pirimiphos-methyl.” This would seem to indicate that the EPA did not anticipate this chemical to be used on anything intentionally fed to birds.

“EPA needs to amend the use label for Actellic 5E and any other pesticide containing the same active ingredient, pirimiphos-methyl, to agree with their own fact sheet, and ensure that no other birds are poisoned by seed dosed with this toxic chemical,” said George Fenwick, President of ABC. “This highlights a key problem that it is the pesticide registrant that writes the labels on pesticides, not EPA. In some cases, it would seem that EPA is not effectively checking that the labels encompass the agency’s responsibilities for birds.”

The plea agreement that will result in Scotts paying $4.5 million in fines must still be approved by the the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.