How Idaho compares
Pay for legislators in Idaho actually is on the low end among the states, at $16,116 a year, though there are some quite a bit lower. That compares to $41,280 a year in Washington, and at the top end, $116,098 in California. Montana, on the other hand, pays just $82.67 per legislative day, which means lawmakers are paid only when they're in session, and their sessions are every other year. Utah pays $130 a day, with sessions limited to 45 days, so that's just $5,850 a year.
But the operations of state legislatures are so different that it's
sometimes hard to compare them. The National Conference of State
Legislatures divides states into three groups: Full-time legislatures,
where lawmakers spend 80 percent or more of their time on lawmaking and
really can't hold another job (like California); hybrids, like
Washington, where legislators work two-thirds time but still have other
income sources; and citizen legislatures, where lawmakers work
half-time and have other jobs - like Idaho. In that bottom third,
Idaho's legislative pay is very close to the average of $15,984.
"Idaho
is right there - they're getting paid the average salary," said Morgan
Cullen, an analyst with NCSL who studies legislative pay. "The pay
shouldn't be the reason that somebody serves in the legislature. But at
the same time, you don't want pay to be the reason that somebody can't
serve in the legislature. So it's trying to just find a compensation
level that allows all citizens from a particular state the opportunity
to run for public office." He noted, "If the legislative salary is so
low that it's only wealthy people or retired people that are able to
serve, that doesn't necessarily reflect the population as a whole."
Pay
increases, like the one Idaho lawmakers are now considering rejecting,
are a tough proposition for legislatures, Cullen said. A few states,
Florida, Massachusetts and Illinois, have their legislative salaries
tied to a cost-of-living index, so they go up automatically. Other
states, like Idaho, have a commission to set salaries; some leave the
decision entirely up to lawmakers themselves. "It's always difficult
politically to increase your own salary," Cullen said. "It's tough to
do in most states."