Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Outdoors blog

Funding for Columbia River salmon hatcheries challenged in court

A worker cuts off the adipose fin of a 3-month-old chinook salmon at the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery to identify it as a hatchery-bred salmon after its release to the wild.  (Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)
A worker cuts off the adipose fin of a 3-month-old chinook salmon at the Issaquah Salmon Hatchery to identify it as a hatchery-bred salmon after its release to the wild. (Associated Press / The Spokesman-Review)

FISHING -- Issues in wild vs. hatchery salmon management in Puget Sound and the Columbia River are far from resolved, according to Wild Fish Conservancy.

On July 14, the Western Washington group filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for Oregon, seeking a court order prohibiting the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) from funding 10 federal Mitchell Act hatchery programs that release hatchery fish that might impact wild Lower Columbia River (LCR) Chinook and coho salmon.

Here's text from the group's media release:

Congress enacted the Mitchell Act in 1938, in an effort to mitigate adverse effects to wild salmon in the Columbia River Basin resulting from the construction of dams, water diversions, logging, and pollution. NMFS distributes funds appropriated under the Mitchell Act that Congress has allocated to hatchery programs. In the past six years, NMFS has disbursed between $13.7 and $22.7 million each year to fund 63 hatchery programs that release more than 50 million hatchery fish into the Columbia River and its tributaries annually.

Over 80% of the fish in the Columbia River basin are of hatchery origin. These hatchery fish, bred in artificial conditions, are less fit to reproduce than the few remaining wild fish. But when the hatchery fish spawn with the wild fish, they reduce the fitness of wild fish, and put the recovery of the LCR fish species in jeopardy. A congressionally-chartered scientific review in 2009 identified harm to wild populations when more than 5% of the fish spawning in wild populations are of hatchery origin. NMFS has explained that it supports the standard that hatchery stray rates should be managed such that less than 5 percent of the naturally spawning population consists of hatchery fish from a different area. Today, the levels of hatchery fish in the Lower Columbia River exceed 80% and 90% for many wild populations, making their extinction almost certain.

“Wild Columbia River salmon face a high risk of extinction,” said Kurt Beardslee, executive director of Wild Fish Conservancy.

“Despite the dire condition of these species, public funds are used to raise and release about 54 million Chinook and 17 million coho hatchery fish into the lower Columbia River and its tributaries every year—mostly from Mitchell Act-funded hatcheries. NMFS, in charge of recovering ESA-listed salmon, is complicit in funding their extinction. An injunction against funding these programs is necessary to protect wild fish from further harm until NMFS complies with its obligations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).”

Federal agencies are obligated under section 7 of the ESA to consult on any action it funds to ensure that that action “is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species.” However, since at least 1999, NMFS has failed to comply with the ESA consultation requirements for nearly all 63 programs. Consultations prior to 1999 are outdated, as several salmon and steelhead population units in the Columbia Basin have since been listed under the ESA and considerable new scientific information about the many ways hatchery fish can harm wild, ESA-listed, salmon has become available. Both the new listings and new scientific information required that previous consultations be re-initiated immediately.

The hatchery programs funded by NMFS under the Mitchell Act adversely affect the ESA-listed species in a variety of ways, including facility effects, fish removal activities, genetic and ecological interactions, fishery effects, and monitoring and evaluation. NMFS is therefore required to consult on these effects under section 7(a)(2) of the ESA. NMFS has failed to initiate or reinitiate consultation and are in direct violation of the ESA for failing to do so.

This motion focuses narrowly on NMFS’s funding of ten hatchery programs operated on behalf of NMFS by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) that harm LCR Chinook and coho salmon.
Wild Fish Conservancy is represented by Kampmeier & Knutsen, PLLC of Portland, OR and Seattle, WA, and the Law Office of David H. Becker, LLC, of Portland, OR.



Rich Landers
Rich Landers joined The Spokesman-Review in 1977. He is the Outdoors editor for the Sports Department writing and photographing stories about hiking, hunting, fishing, boating, conservation, nature and wildlife and related topics.

Follow Rich online:




Go to the full Outdoors page